Jago Grahak jago

State Consumer Helpline Knowledge Resource
Management Portal (SCHKRMP)

Empowering Consumers

Govt. of India
IIPA logo

Daily News Clipping

AEML to hold camps for consumers
Unitech to pay Rs. 1 Cr. to home buyers
WhatsApp chief writes to RBI, seeks nod to expand payment services to all users
What consumers need to know about safe food
RBI likely to keep interest rate unchanged on Dec 5
Home buyers want effective enforcement
Buyers opt for RERA
Google Hangouts for consumers will shut down by 2020
Corporation erecting display boards in violation of rules, says CCC
Should vehicle drivers or owners pay for third-party compensation in accidents
In rare move, Indias top bad-debt buyer eyes consumer loans
Horlicks sold, HUL to merge with GSK Consumer in Indias biggest consumer goods deal
Government plans to revamp its consumer awareness campaign Jago Grahak Jago
Consumers trust private firms more than government with personal data: KPMG
GSK Consumer jumps over 1 on merger with HUL
HC directive on action against KSRTC staff
Former MLA files Rs.15.5 cr cheating complaint
Horlicks brand now in HUL hands
Be careful while shipping furniture across foreign shores
For Amazon, India sees highest product returns
Make TV ratings more accurate, tamper-proof: Industry groups to Trai
HC directs Bharat Petroleum to pay Rs. 1 lakh
Vigilance wing in RERA Karnataka in the pipeline
School fee: Parents may go to court if plea unheard
Aadhaar seeding: 40 co-op. loan accounts have data mismatch
Consumer court directs Unitech to refund 43 homebuyers for 3-year delay in delivery of Noida project
Devise norms for payment apps, RBI told
Brokerages bullish on HUL post deal with GSK
RBI keeps interest rates unchanged
Customers spending more in data analytics to mitigate risks, improve engagement: Infosys
RBI moves to boost digital transactions, protect users
Tipplers add to plastic pile
Lok adalats on power theft cases
Unauthorised hostel owners will end up in jail for two years: Collector
Property developer told to refund home buyers
Low onion acreage could mean tears for consumers
TNRERA ascertains first compensation totalling Rs 4 crore
With do-not-disturb app in store, Apple finally TRAIs hard to warm up to India
Special drive to educate consumers
HC Bench issues direction to Tiruchi Collector
‘Hand over land allotted for law college students hostel’
Indian institutes are helping MNCs work towards R&D?breakthroughs
Auto, cab drivers can send SMS, reduce CNG queues
Jewelry store told to pay refund for ‘false promise’
Bluebells school misused funds, has Rs 2.5cr surplus: Delhi govt
HUL’s earnings likely to rise 4 post GSK Consumer deal
Maternity benefits not just for live births, says consumer court
Water consumption charge assessment takes a hit in city
Government wants GI products on bigger retail canvas
Hoteliers end boycott of food aggregators
HUL unlikely to become the largest food company: Experts
Travel agency told to pay Rs. 60,000 solatium
India likely to offer GST relief for the BPO Industry
Refund people who got high power bills in Mumbai, MERC tells Adani Electricity
Parking contractor told to pay Rs. 6 lakh for missing car
3,072 cases settled in Lok Adalat
Simplified GST return forms to be rolled out from April 1: Revenue Secretary
Government extends GST annual return filing date to March 31, 2019
SBI customer using UPI app defrauded of Rs 6.8 lakh
Development works reviewed
2,046 cases settled in Lok Adalat
ICICI Bank may use mAadhaar for KYC
Trade expects new Agri Policy to give impetus to Sector
SBI account holder Your bank just made EMIs costly loan rates hiked by 0.05, check new rates
IRDAI proposals on life covers will help buyers: Ashish Vohra, Reliance Nippon Life Insurance
Google acquires Where is My Train
GSK Consumer Healthcare to fight case against tech transfer
TRAI moves Supreme Court for discount cap on channel bouquets
Will cashbacks amd deep discounts to lure customers sustain
Consumer Protection Bill awaiting Parliament’s scrutiny
Government likely to meet FY19 digital payments target
Farmer lobby to trade with onion-deficient states directly
Railways to provide jerk-free rides on Shatabdis, Rajdhanis
Gas agencies to face raids
Row over power bills in Gujarati
SBI plans to raise up to 1.25 billion via bonds
Consumer court recuses itself from jeweller’s case
Paytm set to launch Paytm Cashback Days
PDS rice seized in raid
Hold Godrej Consumer Products, target Rs 807: Anand Rathi
RBI moves to boost digital transactions, protect users
Fake drug trade thrives in UP, parts of Uttarakhand
2.76 cr ration cards cancelled
Auto firms looking to ride the EV wave
‘Customers are looking for exciting consumption ideas...we see deals there’
Online companies are now selling meat and a new perception
Fake and bad news depressing markets
Inflation cools, IIP growth surges in double treat for economy
Hospitality industry body FHRAI sends notice to Go-MMT, warns of a nationwide protest
IRDAI unbundles motor, personal accident insurance
eSigns latest victim of SC’s aadhaar verdict, fintech firms may take a hit
Come June, groundwater extraction will invite a fee
Punjab officiallauds PDS in TS
Club told to pay over Rs.1 Lakh as solatium
Delhi HC order: State FDA to crack down on e-pharmacies
Maharashtra govt asks dairies to submit buyback plan for milk pouches
Dairies can use plastic milk pouches till February 15
Delhi HC refuses to stay compensation formula for Johnson and Johnson faulty implants
Google Shopping will be a connector between retailers and consumers
Punjab official lauds paddy procurement
Lost your Aadhaar card Heres how you can get it reprinted
eSigns latest victim of SC’s aadhaar verdict, fintech firms may take a hit

Should vehicle drivers or owners pay for third-party compensation in accidents

Insurers want vehicle owners or drivers to pay stiffer fines or buy additional third-party covers. Not all agree.

Can making them pay a part of the compensation be a solution? ET Wealth speaks to experts.

Jehangir Gai, Consumer Activist, says NO "The law makes it mandatory to have third party insurance coverage for all vehicles. This does not burden the insurer as the compensation is funded by the premium collected."

Drivers, even in metros, earn about Rs 15,000 a month. The working condition of truck drivers, who mostly belong to the lower strata of society and hail from remote villages, is worse. Consequently, they do not have much savings. So, it would be impractical to expect a professional driver to bear a part of the compensation payable to an accident victim. Judicial delays also make it difficult to trace a driver and execute the order several years down the line.

Similar difficulties could arise in affixing liability on the owner of a vehicle. Law is uniformly applicable—it cannot discriminate between affluent and poor vehicle owners. There are several people without much money who buy a vehicle on hire purchase to ply it for gainful employment.

Such persons will not be able to afford payment of any compensation. Moreover, an owner may sell off his vehicle, change residence, migrate, or even be dead by the time the case gets decided. This would make it difficult for the decree holder to execute the award for compensation. Keeping all these factors in mind, the law makes it mandatory to have third party insurance coverage for all vehicles. This methodology does not even put a burden on the insurer, as the compensation payable is funded through the premium which is collected. Another advantage is that insurance companies have a presence throughout the country. So recovery of compensation from the insurer is much simpler.

Hence, payment of the entire compensation by the insurer is in the best interests of of all concerned.

Shailaja Lall Partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas says NO

"For victims, there is no recourse to compensation if the owner or the driver can’t pay it."

The idea of the insured driver/owner sharing a portion of the third-party compensation is flawed. For the insured driver or owner, this defeats the purpose of obtaining third party cover, as the insured will still have to pay out of his pocket and will remain exposed to such liability.

For the victim, there is no recourse to compensation if the owner or the driver has no means to pay it, and in several cases, this will lead to protracted litigation. As per existing laws, interim compensation for death or permanent disablement of a victim works on a no-fault principle. The efficacy of this principle will be impacted if compensation is to be contributed by the owner or driver. The purpose of the no-fault principle is to bring faster relief to victims.

If the insured drivers and owners are made to share a portion of the compensation, then it will open up a lengthy process of investigation to determine fault and the relevance of third party insurance cover can be questioned. The core issue to be addressed in third party motor insurance segment is enforcement of mandatory third party insurance cover rule.

Rakesh Jain Executive Director and CEO, Reliance General Insurance says Yes but... "Owners/drivers can contribute by buying an optional add-on cover."

Getting the insured to directly share the compensation payout is not practical. Claims are filed by the accident victims after a lag. The hearings at the tribunal could also go on for a few years. So, the claimant could receive the compensation only after several years. At that stage, it is not always easy to trace the owner or driver. Thus, it is the poor victim who will have to suffer.

In some parts of the world, there is a minimum mandatory insurance specified under third-party covers. For example, in the US, it is $1,00,000 in most states. It is optional for the driver to buy the additional cover. If a driver chooses to buy protection till $5,00,000, another $4,00,000-cover will be required to be bought.

At the moment, in India, it is an open-ended model for insurers and the whole liability is passed to the insurers. The claims can come in after many years and there is no cap on the likely compensation. My view is that the owners/drivers should participate in compensation sharing by buying an optional add-on cover that insures them against claims exceeding the minimum amount—say Rs 15 lakh—prescribed by law.

Kamesh Goyal Chairman, Digit General Insurance Co says Yes but... "The driver of a vehicle should be fined Rs 10,000 for injury cases and Rs 25,000 for deaths and the vehicle owner should be fined double this. This, in a way would be their contribution."

India has the highest number of road accidents in the world compared to the number of vehicles. The reasons are many. Overloading of vehicles, poorly maintained vehicles, drivers who are untrained or driving on bogus licences, as well as over worked drivers, etc.

Another contributing factor is the way our judicial system is structured. Cases for compensation go on forever and the courts over a period of time have adopted a philosophy that insurance companies should pay more and more compensation while letting go the vehicle owner and driver.This, coupled with the fact that motor third party premium in India has no concept of no claim bonus, has meant vehicle owners and drivers have no incentive or disincentive to reduce road accidents.

Since there is no time limit to file a MACT claim, the concept of NCB will not work as intimations of accident come after 1-2 years also. The only way this will work is if the driver of the vehicle is fined a minimum of Rs 10,000 for injury cases and Rs 25,000 for deaths and the vehicle owner is fined double this amount. This, in a way would be their contribution. The cases can take years, so getting them to pay will be difficult. So, the amount should be deposited in the court as soon as a charge sheet is filed.

If the driver is not traceable, then the owner becomes liable for the driver’s fine as well. Unless people whose vehicles are involved in road accidents are penalised, society will continue to pay a heavy social and economic price for the road accidents.

Translate this page

Help No. States Consumer Helplines

    1800-425-0082, 1800-425-2977
  • ASSAM:
    079-27489945 / 46